{
  "id": 1511338,
  "name": "STATE v. VALENTINE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Valentine",
  "decision_date": "2002-10-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 274P02",
  "first_page": "312",
  "last_page": "312",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 312"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "149 N.C. App. 979",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 297,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.783,
    "sha256": "35cf539fa66ea13aa76353e9f85b65a323e0a874c2520edd85eb5c55abdadc3d",
    "simhash": "1:8e3624638acd1a4f",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. VALENTINE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 3 October 2002. Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 October 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. VALENTINE\nNo. 274P02\nCase below: 149 N.C. App. 979"
  },
  "file_name": "0312-03",
  "first_page_order": 362,
  "last_page_order": 362
}