{
  "id": 1511341,
  "name": "STATE v. AGER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Ager",
  "decision_date": "2002-12-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 528A02",
  "first_page": "616",
  "last_page": "616",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 616"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "152 N.C. App. 577",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9250887
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/152/0577-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 407,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.702,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05651777381615685
    },
    "sha256": "a84be73247d034b1e11caad71436717a0e1477d229b3393e242cd9631a30635e",
    "simhash": "1:eb3e22eaf374e043",
    "word_count": 68
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. AGER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 19 December 2002. Petition defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 19 December 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. AGER\nNo. 528A02\nCase below: 152 N.C. App. 577"
  },
  "file_name": "0616-01",
  "first_page_order": 666,
  "last_page_order": 666
}