{
  "id": 1511211,
  "name": "STATE v. SEXTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sexton",
  "decision_date": "2002-12-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 595PA02",
  "first_page": "622",
  "last_page": "622",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 622"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "153 N.C. App. 641",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9251160
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/153/0641-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 25,
    "char_count": 154,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.786,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05650619012923147
    },
    "sha256": "beee77d74b74fb3c3b22c310baba2fc2c4fbbd4780b0891247476eb8706990dd",
    "simhash": "1:cde914ebc0705669",
    "word_count": 25
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SEXTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 19 December 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SEXTON\nNo. 595PA02\nCase below: 153 N.C. App. 641"
  },
  "file_name": "0622-04",
  "first_page_order": 672,
  "last_page_order": 672
}