{
  "id": 1511461,
  "name": "STATE v. BARTLETT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bartlett",
  "decision_date": "2003-02-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 614P02",
  "first_page": "679",
  "last_page": "679",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 679"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "153 N.C. App. 680",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9251288
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/153/0680-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 281,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.768,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05652781301149218
    },
    "sha256": "39b41810b4dddcca783f1760cf7a5347f9aaeb3c236b74a08aa7655db82eca11",
    "simhash": "1:cfef04ef5a32f81b",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BARTLETT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 February 2003. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 February 2003.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BARTLETT\nNo. 614P02\nCase below: 153 N.C. App. 680"
  },
  "file_name": "0679-04",
  "first_page_order": 729,
  "last_page_order": 729
}