{
  "id": 1511569,
  "name": "STATE v. DUDLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dudley",
  "decision_date": "2003-02-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 443P02",
  "first_page": "684",
  "last_page": "684",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 684"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "151 N.C. App. 749",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 284,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "sha256": "082defd1fa4ce7a40d6f78c85b301562b6dd46fadae163433c14fb6559f9548b",
    "simhash": "1:cbac10775888d049",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DUDLEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 27 February 2003. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 February 2003.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DUDLEY\nNo. 443P02\nCase below: 151 N.C. App. 749"
  },
  "file_name": "0684-05",
  "first_page_order": 734,
  "last_page_order": 734
}