{
  "id": 491675,
  "name": "RICHARD D. SIBLEY, Petitioner v. THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF THERAPY EXAMINERS, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy Examiners",
  "decision_date": "2003-03-28",
  "docket_number": "No. 429A02",
  "first_page": "42",
  "last_page": "42",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 42"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "566 S.E.2d 486",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "151 N.C. App. 367",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9080377
      ],
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/151/0367-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1299,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.751,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.856319230494445e-08,
      "percentile": 0.30435017640024575
    },
    "sha256": "ddbefd8a5131f8a9186331b2e7bab59847117efaaf78d39b72311baedb8be1fd",
    "simhash": "1:1c43559a12b1a0d1",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RICHARD D. SIBLEY, Petitioner v. THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF THERAPY EXAMINERS, Respondent"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hyler & Lopez, P.A., by George B. Hyler, Jr., and Robert J. Lopez, for petitioner-appellant.",
      "Satisky & Silverstein, L.L.P., by John M. Silverstein, for respondent-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RICHARD D. SIBLEY, Petitioner v. THE NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF THERAPY EXAMINERS, Respondent\nNo. 429A02\n(Filed 28 March 2003)\nPhysical Therapy\u2014 suspension of license \u2014 hugs, kisses, sex with patient \u2014 inadequate evidence and findings\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals upholding an order of the Board of Physical Therapy Examiners suspending the license of a physical therapist who hugged and kissed a patient and engaged in sexual intercourse with another patient is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that the evidence and the Board\u2019s findings were inadequate to support the Board\u2019s conclusions that the therapist\u2019s conduct amounted to incompetence in violation of N.C.G.S. \u00a7 90-270.36(9).\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 151 N.C. App. 367, 566 S.E.2d 486 (2002), affirming an order entered 17 November 2000 by Judge Ronald K. Payne in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 March 2003.\nHyler & Lopez, P.A., by George B. Hyler, Jr., and Robert J. Lopez, for petitioner-appellant.\nSatisky & Silverstein, L.L.P., by John M. Silverstein, for respondent-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0042-01",
  "first_page_order": 88,
  "last_page_order": 88
}