{
  "id": 491713,
  "name": "IN RE BARBOSA",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Barbosa",
  "decision_date": "2003-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 141P03",
  "first_page": "160",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 160"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "231 S.E.2d 633",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "634-35"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "291 N.C. 693",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8558987
      ],
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "694-95"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/291/0693-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 560,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.761,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.720015185456745e-08,
      "percentile": 0.35884389398764177
    },
    "sha256": "ee4c01f83450a7ae5d659ba6949ca208b0426d4286e9cd909e3b3f0a8b105c31",
    "simhash": "1:870d97370a0b15fb",
    "word_count": 96
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE BARBOSA"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nRespondent\u2019s notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review have been treated as a writ of certiorari and as such respondent\u2019s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, for reconsideration of its order dismissing respondent\u2019s appeal as moot, in light of this Court\u2019s decision in In re Hatley, 291 N.C. 693, 694-95, 231 S.E.2d 633, 634-35 (1977).\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 1st day of May 2003.\nBrady, J. For the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Brady, J. For the Court"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE BARBOSA\nNo. 141P03"
  },
  "file_name": "0160-01",
  "first_page_order": 206,
  "last_page_order": 206
}