{
  "id": 491808,
  "name": "DONNA PITTMAN, Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pittman v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services",
  "decision_date": "2003-06-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 70A03",
  "first_page": "241",
  "last_page": "241",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 241"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "573 S.E.2d 628",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1242,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.703,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.8172472706271035e-08,
      "percentile": 0.30356711916409024
    },
    "sha256": "23d49bccb52399915443fcd6dee3fca2e800e989912622bbb3bb1babd06b2635",
    "simhash": "1:40b9362364274d58",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DONNA PITTMAN, Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mast, Schulz, Mast, Mills, Stem & Johnson, P.A., by David F. Mills, for petitioner-appellant.",
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Thomas M. Woodward, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DONNA PITTMAN, Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent\nNo. 70A03\n(Filed 13 June 2003)\nPublic Officers and Employees\u2014 health care technician \u2014 termination for unacceptable personal conduct \u2014 insufficient evidence\nA decision of the Court of Appeals upholding the termination of a health care technician at a State facility for unacceptable personal conduct is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that the evidence supported the findings and conclusion of the Administrative Law Judge that the technician should be given only a written warning for unsatisfactory performance.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 155 N.C. App.-, 573 S.E.2d 628 (2002), affirming an order entered 13 July 2001 by Judge Knox V. Jenkins, Jr., in Superior Court, Johnston County. Heard in the Supreme Court 5 May 2003.\nMast, Schulz, Mast, Mills, Stem & Johnson, P.A., by David F. Mills, for petitioner-appellant.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Thomas M. Woodward, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0241-01",
  "first_page_order": 287,
  "last_page_order": 287
}