{
  "id": 491876,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARK MARCOPLOS, NANCY WOODS, PASCAL L. PITTS, LAURA WINBUSH VANDERBECK, JAMES EDWIN WARREN, and RUTH C. ZALPH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Marcoplos",
  "decision_date": "2003-06-13",
  "docket_number": "No. 48A03",
  "first_page": "245",
  "last_page": "245",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 245"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "572 S.E.2d 820",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "154 N.C. App. 581",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9251263
      ],
      "year": 2002,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/154/0581-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1199,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.753,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0997720922370316e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5678838804887852
    },
    "sha256": "72546d483a74dcb0245d4c443135252c98ac2290860a6692f8a80f3b8cc2df78",
    "simhash": "1:ad8876b737add631",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARK MARCOPLOS, NANCY WOODS, PASCAL L. PITTS, LAURA WINBUSH VANDERBECK, JAMES EDWIN WARREN, and RUTH C. ZALPH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nDefendants appeal to this Court from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.\nDefendants, in their brief and at oral argument, further sought review in this Court of a constitutional issue originally presented to but not addressed by the Court of Appeals. We decline to consider this constitutional issue in the first instance. This matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals so that this issue may be addressed by that court.\nAFFIRMED and REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William R Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Glenn, Mills & Fisher, P.A., by Stewart W. Fisher; and George Hausen, for defendant-appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARK MARCOPLOS, NANCY WOODS, PASCAL L. PITTS, LAURA WINBUSH VANDERBECK, JAMES EDWIN WARREN, and RUTH C. ZALPH\nNo. 48A03\n(Filed 13 June 2003)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 154 N.C. App. 581, 572 S.E.2d 820 (2002), finding no error after appeal of judgments entered 9 August 2001 by Judge J.B. Allen, Jr., in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 7 May 2003.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by William R Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.\nGlenn, Mills & Fisher, P.A., by Stewart W. Fisher; and George Hausen, for defendant-appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0245-01",
  "first_page_order": 291,
  "last_page_order": 291
}