{
  "id": 491670,
  "name": "State v. Gonzalez",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Gonzalez",
  "decision_date": "2003-06-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 288P03",
  "first_page": "253",
  "last_page": "253",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 253"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "157 N.C. App. 574",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 194,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.665,
    "sha256": "e0dc9fc904a1c7ec99894528b9e5fa20192b5c45f116ce416cd318345a0ae798",
    "simhash": "1:6e3c26765485ec54",
    "word_count": 34
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Gonzalez"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA02-1173)\n2. Pit\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu\n2. Denied",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "No. 288P03\nCase below: 157 N.C. App. 574\nState v. Gonzalez"
  },
  "file_name": "0253-04",
  "first_page_order": 299,
  "last_page_order": 299
}