{
  "id": 491671,
  "name": "State v. Williams",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "2003-06-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 234P03",
  "first_page": "255",
  "last_page": "255",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 255"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "157 N.C. App. 143",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 34,
    "char_count": 215,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.677,
    "sha256": "abff40f5aeeb320499b05e092248b01ed9ec0eba86d1ce6ffc821451faf2fbe5",
    "simhash": "1:22ad251544e5a4b0",
    "word_count": 38
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Williams"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA02-597)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n1.\u2014\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "No. 234P03\nCase below: 157 N.C. App. 143\nState v. Williams"
  },
  "file_name": "0255-06",
  "first_page_order": 301,
  "last_page_order": 301
}