{
  "id": 491658,
  "name": "State v. Amerson",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Amerson",
  "decision_date": "2003",
  "docket_number": "No. 382P03",
  "first_page": "462",
  "last_page": "462",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 462"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "158 N.C. App. 543",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 214,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.689,
    "sha256": "3e2f0bd12e121c72d7c69c68e0068fb94e90cd5c07577cb3793c04efdffa3487",
    "simhash": "1:723f0b555ec5e296",
    "word_count": 38
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Amerson"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA02-375)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n1.-\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Amerson\nCase below: 158 N.C. App. 543\nNo. 382P03"
  },
  "file_name": "0462-02",
  "first_page_order": 508,
  "last_page_order": 508
}