{
  "id": 491733,
  "name": "State v. Martinez",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Martinez",
  "decision_date": "2003",
  "docket_number": "No. 286P03",
  "first_page": "466",
  "last_page": "466",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 466"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "158 N.C. App. 105",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9186188
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/158/0105-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 215,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.716,
    "sha256": "f3ec9f059e8e4c8078b75c66e0418a7925c9b89899b4ae57edc99bbe5912a235",
    "simhash": "1:322e21155ce5e2d2",
    "word_count": 38
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Martinez"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA02-471)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n1.-\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Martinez\nCase below: 158 N.C. App. 105\nNo. 286P03"
  },
  "file_name": "0466-05",
  "first_page_order": 512,
  "last_page_order": 512
}