{
  "id": 491746,
  "name": "In re Smith",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Smith",
  "decision_date": "2003",
  "docket_number": "No. 386P03",
  "first_page": "506",
  "last_page": "506",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 506"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "158 N.C. App. 743",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 22,
    "char_count": 139,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.655,
    "sha256": "0c7c8aee7c7a3e602a7a97cfec3aeca60df36e1c0e7dba7e69db1f7f89c30080",
    "simhash": "1:3a3e6d77eeb52eb6",
    "word_count": 23
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re Smith"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Respondent\u2019s (Roy Bartley Smith) PDR Pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 (COA02-1689)\nDenied",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re Smith\nCase below: 158 N.C. App. 743\nNo. 386P03"
  },
  "file_name": "0506-01",
  "first_page_order": 552,
  "last_page_order": 552
}