{
  "id": 491683,
  "name": "State v. Kelly",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Kelly",
  "decision_date": "2003",
  "docket_number": "No. 434P03",
  "first_page": "509",
  "last_page": "509",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 509"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "159 N.C. App. 229",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 34,
    "char_count": 212,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.712,
    "sha256": "01cdcf9ee6a7176e9cc885092fcde7662d7a783cda281baf00d8b0967c2dfd16",
    "simhash": "1:723e215540e5a696",
    "word_count": 38
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Kelly"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA02-541)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n1.\u2014\n2. Denied\n3. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Kelly\nCase below: 159 N.C. App. 229\nNo. 434P03"
  },
  "file_name": "0509-06",
  "first_page_order": 555,
  "last_page_order": 555
}