{
  "id": 491749,
  "name": "PHIL S. TAYLOR, Employee v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, Employer, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, Carrier",
  "name_abbreviation": "Taylor v. Bridgestone/Firestone",
  "decision_date": "2003-11-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 280A03",
  "first_page": "565",
  "last_page": "565",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "357 N.C. 565"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "579 S.E.2d 413",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "157 N.C. App. 453",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9187151
      ],
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/157/0453-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1202,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.719,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.01761241678568905
    },
    "sha256": "9588ed61a9f25bacc7fdbd86faa384ce85e8cb29abfa275c9e8696423968b5d0",
    "simhash": "1:28d92e8a3b95c24a",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:54:45.083013+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PHIL S. TAYLOR, Employee v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, Employer, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, Carrier"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edwards & Ricci, P.A., by Brian M. Ricci, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by David A. Rhoades and Jaye E. Bingham, for defendant-appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PHIL S. TAYLOR, Employee v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, Employer, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, Carrier\nNo. 280A03\n(Filed 7 November 2003)\nWorkers\u2019 Compensation\u2014 future medical treatment \u2014 initial burden of proof\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals in a workers\u2019 compensation case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that there was competent evidence in the record to support the Industrial Commission\u2019s finding that plaintiff failed to meet his initial burden of proving that there was a substantial risk of future medical treatments.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2.) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 157 N.C. App. 453, 579 S.E.2d 413 (2003), vacating an opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission filed 18 January 2002 and remanding for rehearing and findings of fact. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 October 2003.\nEdwards & Ricci, P.A., by Brian M. Ricci, for plaintiff-appellee.\nCranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by David A. Rhoades and Jaye E. Bingham, for defendant-appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0565-01",
  "first_page_order": 611,
  "last_page_order": 611
}