{
  "id": 2985028,
  "name": "ALICE MONROE NELSON, LINDA L. MONROE, R.B. MONROE KELLY, JULIAN D. KELLY, JR., MOYNA MONROE, ALICE BLANC MONROE NELSON and husband L. KENT NELSON, BUNROTHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, KATALANTA CORP., KATHRYN B. HEDRICKS, SUSAN B. INMAN, SAMUEL N. EVINS, JR., WALTER P. EVINS, MARGARET EARLY, MARY PRESSLEY, SIDNEY McCARTY, III, MILDRED JOHNSON, JOHN HENRY CHEATHAM, Trustee of the Liela Barnes Cheatham North Carolina Residence Trust v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, a Municipal Corporation; MICHAEL WENTZ v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, a Municipal Corporation",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nelson v. Town of Highlands",
  "decision_date": "2004-04-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 478A03",
  "first_page": "210",
  "last_page": "211",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "358 N.C. 210"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "583 S.E.2d 313",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "159 N.C. App. 393",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8956358
      ],
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/159/0393-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 180,
    "char_count": 1980,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.695,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.497341544922815e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39974936762722457
    },
    "sha256": "0424a4df956da1563c8e5a8c93681762583f417ffb39166696c92bda9f68a549",
    "simhash": "1:623b255b76e3704c",
    "word_count": 308
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:12:52.416221+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "ALICE MONROE NELSON, LINDA L. MONROE, R.B. MONROE KELLY, JULIAN D. KELLY, JR., MOYNA MONROE, ALICE BLANC MONROE NELSON and husband L. KENT NELSON, BUNROTHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, KATALANTA CORP., KATHRYN B. HEDRICKS, SUSAN B. INMAN, SAMUEL N. EVINS, JR., WALTER P. EVINS, MARGARET EARLY, MARY PRESSLEY, SIDNEY McCARTY, III, MILDRED JOHNSON, JOHN HENRY CHEATHAM, Trustee of the Liela Barnes Cheatham North Carolina Residence Trust v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, a Municipal Corporation MICHAEL WENTZ v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, a Municipal Corporation"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Superior Court, Macon County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.\nJustice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Adams Hendon Carson Crow & Saenger, P.A., by Martin Reidinger, for plaintiff-appellants.",
      "Coward, Hicks & Siler, P.A., by William H. Coward, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ALICE MONROE NELSON, LINDA L. MONROE, R.B. MONROE KELLY, JULIAN D. KELLY, JR., MOYNA MONROE, ALICE BLANC MONROE NELSON and husband L. KENT NELSON, BUNROTHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, KATALANTA CORP., KATHRYN B. HEDRICKS, SUSAN B. INMAN, SAMUEL N. EVINS, JR., WALTER P. EVINS, MARGARET EARLY, MARY PRESSLEY, SIDNEY McCARTY, III, MILDRED JOHNSON, JOHN HENRY CHEATHAM, Trustee of the Liela Barnes Cheatham North Carolina Residence Trust v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, a Municipal Corporation MICHAEL WENTZ v. TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, a Municipal Corporation\nNo. 478A03\n(Filed 2 April 2004)\nEminent Domain\u2014 condemnation by town \u2014 owners\u2019 right to pursue injunctive relief\nThe decision by the Court of Appeals that plaintiff landowners had no right to institute an action for injunctive relief to prohibit defendant town from proceeding with the condemnation of their property because plaintiffs had an adequate remedy at law through the condemnation proceeding is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that the legislature, in revising the eminent domain statutes by N.C.G.S. Ch. 40A, intended to preserve the rights of all parties to pursue injunctive relief.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 159 N.C. App. 393, 583 S.E.2d 313 (2003), affirming orders entered 15 January 2002 by Judge James U. Downs in Superior Court, Macon County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 February 2004.\nAdams Hendon Carson Crow & Saenger, P.A., by Martin Reidinger, for plaintiff-appellants.\nCoward, Hicks & Siler, P.A., by William H. Coward, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0210-01",
  "first_page_order": 242,
  "last_page_order": 243
}