{
  "id": 2986056,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. COREY TYRONE SNEED",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sneed",
  "decision_date": "2004-07-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 601PA03",
  "first_page": "538",
  "last_page": "539",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "358 N.C. 538"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "588 S.E.2d 74",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "161 N.C. App. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8957529
      ],
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/161/0331-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1144,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.68,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08653612623747563
    },
    "sha256": "377d7e113bc368e0da809132b8b4b69b9537c8c2a5f2f3a1ceae4896fa04c3c9",
    "simhash": "1:2d4ff4a7563b827a",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:12:52.416221+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. COREY TYRONE SNEED"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nPursuant to this Court\u2019s opinion in State v. Jones, 358 N.C. -, - S.E.2d -(June 25, 2004) (No. 591PA03), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. However, as to the additional assignments of error raised by defendant but not addressed by the Court of Appeals, this case is hereby remanded to the Court of Appeals for its consideration of these issues.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William R Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Lisa Granberry Corbett, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Daniel Shalz for defendant-appellee.",
      "Marshall Hurley, PLLC, by Marshall Hurley, for Families Against Mandatory M\u00ednimums; and Charles E. Daye and Paul M. Green, for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. COREY TYRONE SNEED\nNo. 601PA03\n(Filed 1 July 2004)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 161 N.C. App. 331, 588 S.E.2d 74 (2003), vacating a judgment entered 17 July 2002 by Judge W. Mien Cobb, Jr. in Superior Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 February 2004.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by William R Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Lisa Granberry Corbett, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nDaniel Shalz for defendant-appellee.\nMarshall Hurley, PLLC, by Marshall Hurley, for Families Against Mandatory M\u00ednimums; and Charles E. Daye and Paul M. Green, for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae."
  },
  "file_name": "0538-02",
  "first_page_order": 570,
  "last_page_order": 571
}