{
  "id": 3797897,
  "name": "DIANA MAE PATAKY v. KENNETH PATAKY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pataky v. Pataky",
  "decision_date": "2004-10-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 571A03",
  "first_page": "65",
  "last_page": "65",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 65"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "585 S.E.2d 404",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "160 N.C. App. 289",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8955564
      ],
      "year": 2003,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/160/0289-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 855,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.752,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.5895202466834183e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6818551969632206
    },
    "sha256": "027c369c6de494d3e59512c5c33dfa119f058ba3de96f88ba838337e15b567d5",
    "simhash": "1:0c2904db663de2d4",
    "word_count": 137
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DIANA MAE PATAKY v. KENNETH PATAKY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAs to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.\nAFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY .REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Nix & Cecil, by Lee M. Cecil, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Joyce L. Terres for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DIANA MAE PATAKY v. KENNETH PATAKY\nNo. 571A03\n(Filed 7 October 2004)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 160 N.C. App. 289, 585 S.E.2d 404 (2003), reversing and remanding an Order entered 30 November 2001 by Judge William L. Daisy in District Court, Guilford County. On 5 February 2004, the Supreme Court allowed discretionary review of an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 September 2004.\nNix & Cecil, by Lee M. Cecil, for plaintiff-appellant.\nJoyce L. Terres for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0065-01",
  "first_page_order": 103,
  "last_page_order": 103
}