{
  "id": 3800171,
  "name": "State v. Dennison",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dennison",
  "decision_date": "2004",
  "docket_number": "No. 179A04",
  "first_page": "72",
  "last_page": "72",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 72"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "163 N.C. App. 375",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8917901
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/163/0375-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 49,
    "char_count": 381,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.665,
    "sha256": "1f51638be7e1412a5666d79c18fff55c8f93577b9b7781765b4143df089cfeb5",
    "simhash": "1:9aa702a67b916211",
    "word_count": 68
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Dennison"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. AG\u2019s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas (COA02-1512)\n2. AG\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Dissent\n3. Def\u2019s Motion for Review Pursuant to N.C. R. App. P. Rule 2 \u2014 Motion to Bypass the COA as to Undecided Issue of Insufficiency of Evidence\n4. AG\u2019s PDR as to Additional Issues\n1. Allowed 10/06/04\n3. Denied 10/06/04\n4. Allowed 10/06/04",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Dennison\nNo. 179A04\nCase below: 163 N.C. App. 375"
  },
  "file_name": "0072-03",
  "first_page_order": 110,
  "last_page_order": 110
}