{
  "id": 3803648,
  "name": "State v. Scarlett",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Scarlett",
  "decision_date": "2004",
  "docket_number": "No. 456P04",
  "first_page": "74",
  "last_page": "74",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 74"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "165 N.C. App. 547",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        12631647
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/600/0900-12"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 230,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.654,
    "sha256": "dd8341f9b6f5d8d72189bde7854f993afffaaf991da744b4490a54d82da316d1",
    "simhash": "1:f2223e1648e4a732",
    "word_count": 39
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Scarlett"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA03-1122)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n2. Denied 10/06/04\n3. Allowed 10/06/04",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Scarlett\nNo. 456P04\nCase below: 165 N.C. App. 547"
  },
  "file_name": "0074-01",
  "first_page_order": 112,
  "last_page_order": 112
}