{
  "id": 3796312,
  "name": "State v. Pelham",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pelham",
  "decision_date": "2004",
  "docket_number": "No. 279P04",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "195",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "164 N.C. App. 70",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8895536
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/164/0070-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 219,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.671,
    "sha256": "24e5ae160a2614ed12d965e69461aa00f6d5d3480c84814cc233ae8ba84bda96",
    "simhash": "1:20a2ad1450d4a012",
    "word_count": 38
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Pelham"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA03-636)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n2. Denied (12/02/04)\n3. Allowed",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Pelham\nNo. 279P04\nCase below: 164 N.C. App. 70"
  },
  "file_name": "0195-08",
  "first_page_order": 233,
  "last_page_order": 233
}