{
  "id": 3799246,
  "name": "State v. Ragland",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Ragland",
  "decision_date": "2004",
  "docket_number": "No. 423P04",
  "first_page": "196",
  "last_page": "196",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 196"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "165 N.C. App. 277",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 40,
    "char_count": 281,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.648,
    "sha256": "27ae04f5fac233472d9ab3ea9fc1bb7719fff06e8804e811f5a6ec0cd1fe52c4",
    "simhash": "1:02eb3d07187ca0b8",
    "word_count": 46
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Ragland"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA (COA03-1163)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Sustanntial Constitutional Question\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu (12/02/04)\n2. Denied (12/02/04)\n3. Allowed (12/02/04)",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Ragland\nNo. 423P04\nCase below: 165 N.C. App. 277"
  },
  "file_name": "0196-01",
  "first_page_order": 234,
  "last_page_order": 234
}