{
  "id": 3802753,
  "name": "Sisk v. Tar Heel Capital Corp.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sisk v. Tar Heel Capital Corp.",
  "decision_date": "2004",
  "docket_number": "No. 593P04",
  "first_page": "282",
  "last_page": "282",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 282"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "166 N.C. App. 631",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8412783
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/166/0631-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 26,
    "char_count": 162,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.639,
    "sha256": "3ddb96b7452439b9f155db4c0cbecba1064bbf8b6cdea0fb0719826cb42eaf94",
    "simhash": "1:290c08e01c80a09e",
    "word_count": 26
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sisk v. Tar Heel Capital Corp."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pit\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 (COA04-45)\nDenied 02/03/05",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sisk v. Tar Heel Capital Corp.\nNo. 593P04\nCase below: 166 N.C. App. 631"
  },
  "file_name": "0282-06",
  "first_page_order": 320,
  "last_page_order": 320
}