{
  "id": 3798912,
  "name": "State v. Bailey",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bailey",
  "decision_date": "2004",
  "docket_number": "No. 465A04",
  "first_page": "282",
  "last_page": "282",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 282"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "165 N.C. App. 706",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 24,
    "char_count": 148,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.703,
    "sha256": "a9a7dba3cc815cf8ca37d27b1c4783c58bc7692c18dd81ac9db8f788e82bca3c",
    "simhash": "1:e2a87a263c9c8b51",
    "word_count": 24
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Bailey"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA03-338)\nDismissed ex mero motu 02/03/05",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Bailey\nNo. 465A04\nCase below: 165 N.C. App. 706"
  },
  "file_name": "0282-08",
  "first_page_order": 320,
  "last_page_order": 320
}