{
  "id": 3800894,
  "name": "State v. Odom",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Odom",
  "decision_date": "2005",
  "docket_number": "No. 549P04",
  "first_page": "324",
  "last_page": "324",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 324"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "166 N.C. App. 761",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 211,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.702,
    "sha256": "6aac29ee53e06ab9d67ac6f1b10b7e8be6193dd0fa96e549cc95c60e63e756d9",
    "simhash": "1:ce7a35141c93b052",
    "word_count": 36
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Odom"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA03-600)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu (03/03/05)\n2. Denied (03/03/05)",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Odom\nNo. 549P04\nCase below: 166 N.C. App. 761"
  },
  "file_name": "0324-06",
  "first_page_order": 362,
  "last_page_order": 362
}