{
  "id": 3795063,
  "name": "Neill Grading & Constr. Co. v. Lingafelt",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neill Grading & Constr. Co. v. Lingafelt",
  "decision_date": "2005",
  "docket_number": "No. 112PA05",
  "first_page": "635",
  "last_page": "635",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 635"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "168 N.C. App. 36",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8468081
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/168/0036-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 266,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.703,
    "sha256": "81974f73cd4af19d22a077f6f54125f5f0683e71539cf4c4b20d2814d1cdb8c6",
    "simhash": "1:86ba385613f2f351",
    "word_count": 43
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Neill Grading & Constr. Co. v. Lingafelt"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Defs\u2019 NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA04-108)\n2. Pit\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Defs\u2019 Alternative PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n2. Allowed 06/30/05\n3. Allowed 06/30/05",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Neill Grading & Constr. Co. v. Lingafelt\nNo. 112PA05\nCase Below: 168 N.C. App. 36"
  },
  "file_name": "0635-01",
  "first_page_order": 673,
  "last_page_order": 673
}