{
  "id": 3804371,
  "name": "O & M Indus, v. Smith Eng'g Co.",
  "name_abbreviation": "O & M Indus, v. Smith Eng'g Co.",
  "decision_date": "2005",
  "docket_number": "No. 502PA04",
  "first_page": "635",
  "last_page": "635",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 635"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "165 N.C. App. 705",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        12631702
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/601/0331-08"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 54,
    "char_count": 396,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.678,
    "sha256": "cc659ef13fdd4c2203eb3bdb07e5105f25a1aa74f157adc47d8711fdfdae7870",
    "simhash": "1:ae6ecb940cd08214",
    "word_count": 70
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "O & M Indus, v. Smith Eng\u2019g Co."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA03-432)\n2. Pit\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n3. Pit\u2019s PWC to Review the Decision of the COA\n4. Def\u2019s (Kurz Transfer Products) Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Dismissed ex mero mota 05/04/05\n2. Allowed 05/04/05\n3. Dismissed as moot 05/04/05\n4. Denied 05/04/05",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "O & M Indus, v. Smith Eng\u2019g Co.\nNo. 502PA04\nCase Below: 165 N.C. App. 705"
  },
  "file_name": "0635-02",
  "first_page_order": 673,
  "last_page_order": 673
}