{
  "id": 3802105,
  "name": "Smith v. Barbour",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Barbour",
  "decision_date": "2005",
  "docket_number": "No. 339P05",
  "first_page": "853",
  "last_page": "853",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "359 N.C. 853"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "170 N.C. App. 436",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 33,
    "char_count": 250,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.67,
    "sha256": "1f8a9ecc741be3bcdbd9ff2e8e19154bc3fc70c2e03098aeb56251ebf2fa9345",
    "simhash": "1:6a38151e1c04a060",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:02.499353+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Smith v. Barbour"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s (Staci Day Barbour) NOA Based Upon A Constitutional Question (COA04792 & COA04-1144)\n2. Def\u2019s (Staci Day Barbour) PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Dismissed ex mero motu 08/18/05\n2. Denied 08/18/05",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Smith v. Barbour\nNo. 339P05\n170 N.C. App. 436"
  },
  "file_name": "0853-04",
  "first_page_order": 891,
  "last_page_order": 891
}