{
  "id": 3794651,
  "name": "State v. Prentice",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Prentice",
  "decision_date": "2005-10-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 367P05",
  "first_page": "74",
  "last_page": "74",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 74"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "170 N.C. App. 593",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9006236
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/170/0593-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 31,
    "char_count": 206,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.654,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.11255636911650062
    },
    "sha256": "be2a8f4cd3369ef1a0df4836129750539f6e5e2202f3ce1e9aa6d96f5baeffe0",
    "simhash": "1:d6b78f265995c751",
    "word_count": 35
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Prentice"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA04-764)\n2. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Def\u2019s PDR",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Prentice\nCase Below: 170 N.C. App. 593\nNo. 367P05\n2. Allowed 10/06/05\n3. Denied 10/06/05"
  },
  "file_name": "0074-08",
  "first_page_order": 146,
  "last_page_order": 146
}