{
  "id": 3789934,
  "name": "State v. Stamey",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Stamey",
  "decision_date": "2005-10-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 364P05",
  "first_page": "76",
  "last_page": "76",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 76"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "170 N.C. App. 699",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.628,
    "sha256": "e532a2a26765b599e6e3a6463e178c15eb28e1ee82a532e6c9b3ab07224fe181",
    "simhash": "1:90b70f361cbcf773",
    "word_count": 39
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Stamey"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA04-1031)\n2. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Stamey\nCase Below: 170 N.C. App. 699\nNo. 364P05\n2. Allowed 10/06/05\n3. Denied 10/06/05"
  },
  "file_name": "0076-02",
  "first_page_order": 148,
  "last_page_order": 148
}