{
  "id": 3798368,
  "name": "Peninsula Prop. Owners Ass'n v. Crescent Res., LLC",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peninsula Prop. Owners Ass'n v. Crescent Res., LLC",
  "decision_date": "2005-12-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 421P05",
  "first_page": "177",
  "last_page": "177",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 177"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "171 N.C. App. 89",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8434880
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/171/0089-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 41,
    "char_count": 274,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.683,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.11270425418624792
    },
    "sha256": "867cdfe2f692e886c390c42af131ccc1063cae4c982dec284cf77da259793989",
    "simhash": "1:1af678405534f013",
    "word_count": 45
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Peninsula Prop. Owners Ass\u2019n v. Crescent Res., LLC"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Substantial Constitutional Question (COA04-796)\n2. Def\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Pit\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Peninsula Prop. Owners Ass\u2019n v. Crescent Res., LLC\nCase Below: 171 N.C. App. 89\nNo. 421P05\n2. Allowed 12/01/05\n3. Denied 12/01/05"
  },
  "file_name": "0177-01",
  "first_page_order": 249,
  "last_page_order": 249
}