{
  "id": 3790534,
  "name": "HARRY E. MUNN, JR. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Munn v. North Carolina State University",
  "decision_date": "2006-03-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 567A05",
  "first_page": "353",
  "last_page": "354",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 353"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "617 S.E.2d 335",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12633715
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/617/0335-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1737,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.73,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.438268427707918e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8027850272351785
    },
    "sha256": "7bf3f44c3e8273e038c47d48856df5a831aa081fd3304220f92be6185ff82274",
    "simhash": "1:0d23168bf11531d6",
    "word_count": 274
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HARRY E. MUNN, JR. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAs to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.\nREVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Unti & Lumsden LLP, by Michael L. Unti and Sharon L. Smith, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II and Kimberly D. Potter, Assistant Attorneys General, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HARRY E. MUNN, JR. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY\nNo. 567A05\n(Filed 3 March 2006)\nAppeal and Error; Damages and Remedies\u2014 breach of contract \u2014 nominal damages \u2014 improper assignments of error\u2014 failure to object to instructions\nA decision of the Court of Appeals awarding plaintiff university professor a new trial on the issue of damages in an action for breach of a reemployment contract in which the jury awarded plaintiff nominal damages of one dollar is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that plaintiff\u2019s assignments of error violated the Rules of Appellate Procedure and plaintiff neither objected to nor assigned error to the jury instructions.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 173 N.C. App.-, 617 S.E.2d 335 (2005), vacating an order denying plaintiff\u2019s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial entered 19 December 2003 by Judge J.B. Allen, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County, and remanding for a new trial on damages only. On 3 November 2005, the Supreme Court allowed defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 2006.\nUnti & Lumsden LLP, by Michael L. Unti and Sharon L. Smith, for plaintiff-appellee.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II and Kimberly D. Potter, Assistant Attorneys General, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0353-01",
  "first_page_order": 425,
  "last_page_order": 426
}