{
  "id": 3791621,
  "name": "State v. Hillier",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hillier",
  "decision_date": "2006-05-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 032P06",
  "first_page": "487",
  "last_page": "487",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 487"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "175 N.C. App. 248",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 233,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.67,
    "sha256": "73f21fd7b44ba35035bd79f6f8a9866fc94c4dcb76fe64eebb1ec9c26b5bae91",
    "simhash": "1:b8be241754956156",
    "word_count": 39
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Hillier"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA04-1654)\n2. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Hillier\nCase Below: 175 N.C. App. 248\nNo. 032P06\n2. Allowed (05/04/06)\n3. Denied (05/04/06)"
  },
  "file_name": "0487-06",
  "first_page_order": 559,
  "last_page_order": 559
}