{
  "id": 3787645,
  "name": "In re S.L.H.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re S.L.H.",
  "decision_date": "2006-06-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 040P06",
  "first_page": "534",
  "last_page": "534",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 534"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "175 N.C. App. 420",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 21,
    "char_count": 133,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.62,
    "sha256": "6bb24178b58ae7510a6b2225c027ea5f09fcdc9a38314f9d2f990f63f2525374",
    "simhash": "1:b4ea18e11cb12012",
    "word_count": 21
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re S.L.H."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Respondent\u2019s (Mother) PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 (COA05-594)",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re S.L.H.\nCase below: 175 N.C. App. 420\nNo. 040P06\nDenied (06/29/06)"
  },
  "file_name": "0534-05",
  "first_page_order": 606,
  "last_page_order": 606
}
