{
  "id": 3791607,
  "name": "State v. Autry",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Autry",
  "decision_date": "2006-06-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 193P06",
  "first_page": "536",
  "last_page": "536",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 536"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "176 N.C. App. 408",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 212,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.663,
    "sha256": "2d0b05f7676a2d42fcd8922168130c96f7eb32cb8dad7f8e96886b17e27960e6",
    "simhash": "1:aeb8d895d0bfb042",
    "word_count": 36
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Autry"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-839)\n2. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Autry\nCase below: 176 N.C. App. 408\nNo. 193P06\n1. Dismissed Ex Mero Mota (06/29/06)\n2. Denied (06/29/06)"
  },
  "file_name": "0536-04",
  "first_page_order": 608,
  "last_page_order": 608
}