{
  "id": 3789977,
  "name": "State v. Witham",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Witham",
  "decision_date": "2006-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 452P06",
  "first_page": "654",
  "last_page": "654",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 N.C. 654"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "178 N.C. App. 564",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.639,
    "sha256": "a143d43dafdf70ca00a03edea29b43329dc69b820951e8efcf2168614e9a79bb",
    "simhash": "1:343e291756ade316",
    "word_count": 39
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:28:24.883894+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Witham"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-1350)\n2. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Witham\nCase below: 178 N.C. App. 564\nNo. 452P06\n2. Allowed 10/05/06\n3. Denied 10/05/06"
  },
  "file_name": "0654-05",
  "first_page_order": 726,
  "last_page_order": 726
}