{
  "id": 3745548,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRANDON M. CAPLES; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHRISTOPHER G. MITCHELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Caples",
  "decision_date": "2006-12-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 512P05",
  "first_page": "165",
  "last_page": "165",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 165"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "361 N.C. 41",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3736985
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2006,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/361/0041-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 78,
    "char_count": 1205,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.10999695349033863
    },
    "sha256": "07f60aac4544ef90cacb7271a9e0f4d5bf4a481dc13756ed1511ac2a56635720",
    "simhash": "1:08bd7473a501e6db",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRANDON M. CAPLES STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHRISTOPHER G. MITCHELL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe Attorney General\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review for defendant Cap\u00edes is allowed, pursuant to our general supervisory authority under Article IV, Section 12 of the Constitution of North Carolina, for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, - S.E.2d-(2006). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.\nThe Attorney General\u2019s Petition for Discretionary Review for defendant Mitchell is allowed for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, -S.E.2d-(2006). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.\nBy Order of the Court in Conference, this 21st day of December, 2006.\ns/Timmons-Goodson. J. For the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/Timmons-Goodson. J. For the Court"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRANDON M. CAPLES STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHRISTOPHER G. MITCHELL\nNo. 512P05"
  },
  "file_name": "0165-01",
  "first_page_order": 223,
  "last_page_order": 223
}