{
  "id": 3737667,
  "name": "Rodgers v. Ingham",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rodgers v. Ingham",
  "decision_date": "2007",
  "docket_number": "No. 602P06",
  "first_page": "221",
  "last_page": "221",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 221"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "179 N.C. App. 864",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 245,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.706,
    "sha256": "ce2a383f02ef4a25cfcd58cd8decff65b8f3f3952cb93bdbd43c8b3c5b2abbc6",
    "simhash": "1:d80e081574a534b2",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rodgers v. Ingham"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-1568)\n2. Def\u2019s (Gamble) Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Pit\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. _\n2. Allowed 01/25/07\n3. Denied 01/25/07",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rodgers v. Ingham\nCase below: 179 N.C. App. 864\nNo. 602P06"
  },
  "file_name": "0221-05",
  "first_page_order": 279,
  "last_page_order": 279
}