{
  "id": 3743006,
  "name": "State v. Rose",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Rose",
  "decision_date": "2007",
  "docket_number": "No. 300P06",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "177 N.C. App. 463",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 228,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.707,
    "sha256": "da4d9eeb9046b7a2a12dd295702046d3bd87af7f8e116b4f853a7b7720e6271a",
    "simhash": "1:d406b05764a476f3",
    "word_count": 40
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Rose"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Defs NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-994)\n2. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. _\n2. Allowed 01/25/07\n3. Denied 01/25/07",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Rose\nCase below: 177 N.C. App. 463\nNo. 300P06"
  },
  "file_name": "0226-01",
  "first_page_order": 284,
  "last_page_order": 284
}