{
  "id": 3735600,
  "name": "State v. Whaley",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Whaley",
  "decision_date": "2007-05-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 440PA06",
  "first_page": "369",
  "last_page": "369",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 369"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "178 N.C. App. 563",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 57,
    "char_count": 447,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.742,
    "sha256": "afd722e40f0e96b42200d9413fb0756c4059ac50892e999e3870e7a19b8de769",
    "simhash": "1:e4780a316124e1f2",
    "word_count": 74
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "State v. Whaley"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-948)\n2. AG\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S, \u00a7 7A-31\n1. \u2014\n2. Allowed 05/03/07\n3. Allowed on the issue whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court to exclude the testimony and evidence offered at defendant\u2019s trial regarding the victim\u2019s credibility and mental state. 05/03/07",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "State v. Whaley\nCase below: 178 N.C. App. 563\nNo. 440PA06"
  },
  "file_name": "0369-01",
  "first_page_order": 427,
  "last_page_order": 427
}