{
  "id": 3739052,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRAIG CLIFFORD WISSINK",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Wissink",
  "decision_date": "2007-06-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 484PA05",
  "first_page": "418",
  "last_page": "419",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 418"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "617 S.E.2d 319",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12633713
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/617/0319-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 N.C. App. 829",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8321682
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/172/0829-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "638 S.E.2d 452",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12637356
      ],
      "year": 2006,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "455, 458-59",
          "parenthetical": "explaining that Blakely error is subject to harmless error review"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/638/0452-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "643 S.E.2d 915",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12638285
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "918",
          "parenthetical": "holding \"a judge may not find an aggravating factor on the basis of a defendant's admission unless that defendant personally or through counsel admits the necessary facts or admits that the aggravating factor is applicable\""
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/643/0915-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 U.S.L.W. 3609",
      "category": "reporters:specialty",
      "reporter": "U.S.L.W.",
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 N.C. 41",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3736985
      ],
      "year": 2006,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "44, 49-51",
          "parenthetical": "explaining that Blakely error is subject to harmless error review"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/361/0041-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 N.C. 325",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3739670
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "330",
          "parenthetical": "holding \"a judge may not find an aggravating factor on the basis of a defendant's admission unless that defendant personally or through counsel admits the necessary facts or admits that the aggravating factor is applicable\""
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/361/0325-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "542 U.S. 296",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        5868041
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2004,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/542/0296-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 175,
    "char_count": 1807,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.773,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.442620388940177e-08,
      "percentile": 0.484649105025042
    },
    "sha256": "4aa8b4092ecf55b742e611d0aefa0d314e556bee6780b4ba7cfffd4aefabe8be",
    "simhash": "1:088e32226635844c",
    "word_count": 288
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRAIG CLIFFORD WISSINK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAlthough the Court of Appeals addressed several issues in its opinion, we allowed review solely for consideration of whether the trial court\u2019s finding of defendant\u2019s probationary status constituted error under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), and whether defendant had knowingly and voluntarily stipulated to his probationary status. The decision of the Court of Appeals to remand for resentencing is reversed, and we remand this case to that court for reconsideration of these two issues in light of our decisions in State v. Hurt, 361 N.C. 325, 330, 643 S.E.2d 915, 918 (2007) (holding \u201ca judge may not find an aggravating factor on the basis of a defendant\u2019s admission unless that defendant personally or through counsel admits the necessary facts or admits that the aggravating factor is applicable\u201d) and State v. Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, 44, 49-51, 638 S.E.2d 452, 455, 458-59 (2006) (explaining that Blakely error is subject to harmless error review), cert. denied, -U.S. \u2014, \u2014 L. Ed. 2d -, 75 U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.\nREVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel R O\u2019Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.",
      "M. Alexander Chams for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRAIG CLIFFORD WISSINK\nNo. 484PA05\n(Filed 29 June 2007)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 172 N.C. App. 829, 617 S.E.2d 319 (2005), finding no error in part in judgments entered 1 April 2004 by Judge Knox V. Jenkins in Superior Court, Cumberland County, but remanding for resentencing on defendant\u2019s conviction for discharging a firearm into occupied property. Heard in the Supreme Court 7 May 2007.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel R O\u2019Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.\nM. Alexander Chams for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0418-01",
  "first_page_order": 476,
  "last_page_order": 477
}