{
  "id": 3746894,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ELIZABETH PAIGE McMAHAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McMahan",
  "decision_date": "2007-06-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 657PA05",
  "first_page": "420",
  "last_page": "421",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 420"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "621 S.E.2d 319",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12634316
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/621/0319-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "174 N.C. App. 586",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8352711
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/174/0586-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 N.C. 410",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3742371
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "No. 283PA06"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/361/0410-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1091,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.744,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.34684975842220916
    },
    "sha256": "8f03084281ed4d6276a5b0ce0f0c4236a089a1c84f498cf19a350eaff7afc05f",
    "simhash": "1:1f973e7b7273447a",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ELIZABETH PAIGE McMAHAN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in State v. Holmes, 361 N.C. 410, - S.E.2d \u2014 (2007) (No. 283PA06), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.",
      "Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Matthew D. Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ELIZABETH PAIGE McMAHAN\nNo. 657PA05\n(Filed 29 June 2007)\nOn discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 174 N.C. App. 586, 621 S.E.2d 319 (2005), vacating probation revocation judgments entered 6 August 2004 by Judge Susan C. Taylor in Superior Court, Cabarrus County, thereby activating sentences imposed in judgments entered 8 August 2003 by Judge Howard R. Greeson, Jr. in Superior Court, Guilford County following defendant\u2019s plea of guilty to twenty-eight counts of embezzlement, and remanding for a new sentencing hearing. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 May 2007.\nRoy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.\nStaples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Matthew D. Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0420-01",
  "first_page_order": 478,
  "last_page_order": 479
}
