{
  "id": 3736095,
  "name": "IN RE E.F.S., JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re E.F.S.",
  "decision_date": "2007-06-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 285P06",
  "first_page": "423",
  "last_page": "423",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 423"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "239 S.E.2d 483",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "484"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "34 N.C. App. 614",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8551017
      ],
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "615-16"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/34/0614-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "502 S.E.2d 819",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "823"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "348 N.C. 588",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        1659735
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "595"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/348/0588-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 62,
    "char_count": 588,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.10961681549773751
    },
    "sha256": "a88cf99c21b4bf2490aa8b82f79379779a59db0636744a4a9ddc092a7f7360ca",
    "simhash": "1:a139f6ef122366b8",
    "word_count": 107
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE E.F.S., JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nThe Attorney General\u2019s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of vacating the Court of Appeals\u2019 order denying the Attorney General\u2019s petition for writ of certiorari and remanding to the Court of Appeals for review on the merits in light of this Court\u2019s decision in State v. Green, 348 N.C. 588, 595, 502 S.E.2d 819, 823 (1998) and the Court of Appeals\u2019 decision in In re Bunn, 34 N.C. App. 614, 615-16, 239 S.E.2d 483, 484 (1977).\nBy order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007.\nHudson, J. For the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hudson, J. For the Court"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE E.F.S., JR.\nNo. 285P06"
  },
  "file_name": "0423-01",
  "first_page_order": 481,
  "last_page_order": 481
}