{
  "id": 3741259,
  "name": "Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty.",
  "decision_date": "2007",
  "docket_number": "No. 067P07",
  "first_page": "569",
  "last_page": "569",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 569"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "181 N.C. App. 224",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8373396
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/181/0224-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "639 S.E.2d 421",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12637514
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/639/0421-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 N.C. 193",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        3739419
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/361/0193-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 416,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.675,
    "sha256": "0b9d94b1845b263dfa854108ea947784d8c4d2b9400e9f811151aae81cf492ff",
    "simhash": "1:3a792f37362d3efb",
    "word_count": 71
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. ! (COA06-68) 7A-31\n2. Def\u2019s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. Allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its decision in light of Robins v. Town of Hillsborough, 361 N.C. 193, 639 S.E.2d 421 (2007) 08/23/07\n2. Dismissed as moot 08/23/07",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty.\nCase below: 181 N.C. App. 224\nNo. 067P07"
  },
  "file_name": "0569-04",
  "first_page_order": 627,
  "last_page_order": 627
}