{
  "id": 3744569,
  "name": "Sisk v. City of Greensboro",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sisk v. City of Greensboro",
  "decision_date": "2007",
  "docket_number": "No. 305P07",
  "first_page": "569",
  "last_page": "569",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 569"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 39,
    "char_count": 311,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.645,
    "sha256": "01c3a0482c693628569982919137cc35fe48430bfff75588b73c437a26064aca",
    "simhash": "1:8ae86dd342f9a2b4",
    "word_count": 55
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sisk v. City of Greensboro"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Pit\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31 (COA06-1253)\n2. Def\u2019s Motion to Strike Pit\u2019s Amendment to PDR\n3. Pit\u2019s Second Amendment to PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31(c)\n1. Denied 08/23/07\n2. Allowed 08/23/07\n3. Dismissed ex mero motu 08/23/07",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sisk v. City of Greensboro\nCase below: 183 N.C. App. - (5 June 2007)\nNo. 305P07"
  },
  "file_name": "0569-05",
  "first_page_order": 627,
  "last_page_order": 627
}
