{
  "id": 3735815,
  "name": "MICKEY PLOTT, Employee v. BOJANGLE'S RESTAURANTS, INC., Employer, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA c/o AIG CLAIM SERVICES, Carrier",
  "name_abbreviation": "Plott v. Bojangle's Restaurants, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "2007-10-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 55A07",
  "first_page": "577",
  "last_page": "578",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 577"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "638 S.E.2d 571",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12637391
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/638/0571-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "181 N.C. App. 61",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8372005
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/181/0061-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1413,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.745,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.0011153170616546e-08,
      "percentile": 0.31454285558733347
    },
    "sha256": "556c3865343f3a051d9ccc7f0d52ae3b421864f95b462bfbe0e506e96d8003ef",
    "simhash": "1:28df759b238c0a09",
    "word_count": 217
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "MICKEY PLOTT, Employee v. BOJANGLE\u2019S RESTAURANTS, INC., Employer, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA c/o AIG CLAIM SERVICES, Carrier"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.\nREVERSED.\nJustice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Raymond M. Marshall and Jay A. Gervasi, Jr. for plaintiffappellee.",
      "Robinson & Lawing, L.L.R, by Jolinda J. Babcock, for defendant-appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MICKEY PLOTT, Employee v. BOJANGLE\u2019S RESTAURANTS, INC., Employer, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA c/o AIG CLAIM SERVICES, Carrier\nNo. 55A07\n(Filed 12 October 2007)\nWorkers\u2019 Compensation\u2014 disability benefits \u2014 refusal of sedentary employment\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals in a workers\u2019 compensation case is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that evidence before the Industrial Commission supported its determination that plaintiff was not entitled to ongoing benefits because defendant employer offered him sedentary employment at his preinjury wage after he was released by his physician to return to work, but plaintiff refused to attempt this employment and has not made reasonable efforts to find suitable employment.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C. App. 61, 638 S.E.2d 571 (2007), reversing and remanding an opinion and award filed on 8 July 2005 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the . Supreme Court 12 September 2007.\nRaymond M. Marshall and Jay A. Gervasi, Jr. for plaintiffappellee.\nRobinson & Lawing, L.L.R, by Jolinda J. Babcock, for defendant-appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0577-01",
  "first_page_order": 635,
  "last_page_order": 636
}