{
  "id": 3742720,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DWIGHT McDOUGALD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McDougald",
  "decision_date": "2007-10-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 64A07",
  "first_page": "689",
  "last_page": "689",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 689"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 588,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.791,
    "sha256": "63e291164adb787c62940e4ee572778075cfdae9f2e1ca3889b549cd08c9ab71",
    "simhash": "1:e0399722680bb44a",
    "word_count": 93
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DWIGHT McDOUGALD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nDefendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is allowed with respect to defendant\u2019s argument that his appeal of his jury conviction for conspiracy to traffic by possessing 100 or more but less than 500 dosages of methylenedioxyamphetamine was not in violation of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. The remainder of defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is denied.\nBy order of the Court in conference, this 11th day of October 2007.\nHudson, J. For the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hudson, J. For the Court"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DWIGHT McDOUGALD\nNo. 64A07"
  },
  "file_name": "0689-01",
  "first_page_order": 747,
  "last_page_order": 747
}