{
  "id": 3744162,
  "name": "Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Woodley",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fund v. Woodley",
  "decision_date": "2007",
  "docket_number": "No. 127P07",
  "first_page": "690",
  "last_page": "690",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 N.C. 690"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "181 N.C. App. 594",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8375565
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/181/0594-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 251,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.698,
    "sha256": "21f805292f34108a90cfed8db3f95bcb38e086ac30853051bb4905a16b196f6b",
    "simhash": "1:962aaa149eadb010",
    "word_count": 43
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:19:48.141297+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Woodley"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1. Def\u2019s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-358)\n2. Pit\u2019s Motion to Dismiss Appeal\n3. Def\u2019s PDR Under N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-31\n1. _\n2. Allowed 10/11/07\n3. Denied 10/11/07",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Woodley\nCase below: 181 N.C. App. 594\nNo. 127P07"
  },
  "file_name": "0690-01",
  "first_page_order": 748,
  "last_page_order": 748
}