{
  "id": 4150785,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF IBM CREDIT CORPORATION from the decision of the Durham County Board of County Commissioners concerning the valuation and taxation of personal property for tax year 2001",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re IBM Credit Corp.",
  "decision_date": "2008-03-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 520A07",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "229",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "362 N.C. 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "650 S.E.2d 828",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        12639481
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/se2d/650/0828-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "186 N.C. App. 223",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8155535
      ],
      "year": 2007,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/186/0223-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 913,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.741,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.5226658498133174e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6695674149342298
    },
    "sha256": "1c88fb91286502d7afc824f0b38b41dc9e3b6798ce20cc33f5696163b1e57117",
    "simhash": "1:66c134b844ed7af8",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:47:03.529976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF IBM CREDIT CORPORATION from the decision of the Durham County Board of County Commissioners concerning the valuation and taxation of personal property for tax year 2001"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nAFFIRMED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Manning Fulton & Skinner P.A., by Michael T. Medford and Judson A. Welbom, for taxpayer-appellee.",
      "S.C. Kitchen, Durham County Attorney, for respondent-appellant.",
      "James B. Blackburn, III, General Counsel, North Carolina Association of County Commissioners; and Lucy Chavis, Assistant Wake County Attorney, for North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, amicus curiae."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF IBM CREDIT CORPORATION from the decision of the Durham County Board of County Commissioners concerning the valuation and taxation of personal property for tax year 2001\nNo. 520A07\n(Filed 7 March 2008)\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 186 N.C. App. 223, 650 S.E.2d 828 (2007), remanding a final decision entered on 30 March 2006 by the North Carolina Property Tax Commission. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2008.\nManning Fulton & Skinner P.A., by Michael T. Medford and Judson A. Welbom, for taxpayer-appellee.\nS.C. Kitchen, Durham County Attorney, for respondent-appellant.\nJames B. Blackburn, III, General Counsel, North Carolina Association of County Commissioners; and Lucy Chavis, Assistant Wake County Attorney, for North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, amicus curiae."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 306,
  "last_page_order": 307
}